Reference vs Pointer to Const

What's the difference between a reference and a pointer to const in terms of function parameters?

When it comes to function parameters, both references to const and pointers to const are commonly used for passing objects efficiently without allowing modification. However, there are some key differences in their behavior and use cases.

Let's compare them

Syntax and Usage

In this example, we compare the two types:

#include <iostream>
#include <string>

void PrintByRef(const std::string& str) {
  std::cout << "Reference: " << str << '\n';
}

void PrintByPtr(const std::string* str) {
  if (str) {
    std::cout << "Pointer: " << *str << '\n';
  } else {
    std::cout << "Null pointer\n";
  }
}

int main() {
  std::string message{"Hello, World!"};

  PrintByRef(message);
  PrintByPtr(&message);
  PrintByPtr(nullptr);  // This is valid

  // This would be a compile-time error
  PrintByRef(nullptr); 
}
Reference: Hello, World!
Pointer: Hello, World!
Null pointer

Key differences:

  1. Nullability: Pointers can be null, references cannot. This means you can pass nullptr to a function expecting a pointer, but not to one expecting a reference.
  2. Syntax: References use more intuitive syntax (just like passing by value), while pointers require dereferencing with when accessing the value.
  3. Optionality: Pointers can represent optional parameters (by allowing null), while references always expect a valid object.
  4. Safety: References are generally safer as they can't be null and don't require checking before use.

Performance

In terms of performance, references and pointers are essentially identical. The compiler typically implements references using pointers under the hood.

Const Correctness

Both const T& and const T* prevent modification of the pointed-to object:

#include <iostream>

void ModifyByRef(const int& x) {
  // x++;  // Compilation error
  std::cout << "Reference value: " << x << '\n';
}

void ModifyByPtr(const int* x) {
  // (*x)++;  // Compilation error
  if (x) {
    std::cout << "Pointer value: " << *x << '\n';
  }
}

int main() {
  int value{42};
  ModifyByRef(value);
  ModifyByPtr(&value);
}

When to Use Each

Use references when:

  • The parameter is required and will always be valid.
  • You want a cleaner syntax in the function body.
  • You want to prevent accidental null dereferences.

Use pointers when:

  • The parameter is optional (can be null).
  • You might need to change what the pointer points to.
  • You're working with C-style APIs or older codebases.

In modern C++, references are often preferred for their safety and cleaner syntax, unless you specifically need the nullability or rebinding capabilities of pointers.

References

This lesson introduces references, explaining how they work, their benefits, and their role in performance and data manipulation

Questions & Answers

Answers are generated by AI models and may not have been reviewed. Be mindful when running any code on your device.

Swapping Values Using References
How can I use references to swap the values of two variables without using a temporary variable?
Creating an Array of References
Is it possible to create an array of references in C++?
References and Runtime Polymorphism
Can I use references with polymorphic classes to achieve runtime polymorphism?
Implementing Observer Pattern with References
How can I use references to implement a simple observer pattern in C++?
Dangers of Returning References to Local Objects
What are the implications of returning a reference from a function that creates a local object?
Or Ask your Own Question
Get an immediate answer to your specific question using our AI assistant