Compiler Support for Copy Elision

Is copy elision guaranteed to happen in all cases where it is possible, or does it depend on the compiler and optimization settings?

Copy elision, including Return Value Optimization (RVO), is a compiler optimization technique that eliminates unnecessary copies of objects. However, the degree to which copy elision is applied can vary depending on the compiler and the optimization settings used.

In C++17 and later, certain forms of copy elision are guaranteed by the language standard. Specifically, the standard requires that copy elision is performed in the following cases:

  1. When an object is returned directly from a function, and the return type matches the type of the returned object.
  2. When an exception is thrown, and the exception object is copied from a temporary object.
  3. When a temporary object is bound to a reference or used to initialize an object, and the lifetime of the temporary object would extend to the lifetime of the reference or object.

In these cases, the compiler must perform copy elision, and the copy or move constructors are not called.

Here's an example where copy elision is guaranteed:

MyClass createObject() {
  // Guaranteed copy elision
  return MyClass{};
}

int main() {
  // No copy or move constructor called
  MyClass obj = createObject();
}

However, in other cases, copy elision is still optional and depends on the compiler and optimization settings. For example:

MyClass createObject(bool flag) {
  MyClass obj1, obj2;

  // Optional copy elision
  return flag ? obj1 : obj2;
}

In this case, the compiler may or may not perform copy elision when returning obj1 or obj2, depending on its optimization capabilities and the settings used.

It's important to note that even if copy elision is not performed, the compiler is still allowed to optimize out the copy or move operations if they have no observable side effects.

To ensure maximum performance, it's generally recommended to:

  1. Enable compiler optimizations when building your code in release mode.
  2. Write code that facilitates copy elision, such as returning objects directly from functions.
  3. Implement move semantics for your classes to enable efficient transfer of resources when copy elision is not possible.

By relying on guaranteed copy elision and enabling compiler optimizations, you can write efficient code that minimizes unnecessary copies and moves.

Copy Semantics and Return Value Optimization

Learn how to control exactly how our objects get copied, and take advantage of copy elision and return value optimization (RVO)

Questions & Answers

Answers are generated by AI models and may not have been reviewed. Be mindful when running any code on your device.

Unique Pointers and Copy Constructors
Why does the compiler generate an error when I try to define a copy constructor for a class containing a unique_ptr member?
The Rule of Five
I have heard about the "Rule of Five" in C++. What is it, and how does it relate to the Rule of Three mentioned in the lesson?
Copy Elision and Side Effects
What potential issues can arise if I include side effects (e.g., modifying global variables or performing I/O operations) in my copy constructor or destructor?
Copy-and-Swap Idiom
What is the copy-and-swap idiom, and how can it be used to implement the copy assignment operator?
Move Semantics
The lesson mentions that move semantics can be used to make classes more efficient. Can you briefly explain what move semantics are and how they differ from copy semantics?
Or Ask your Own Question
Get an immediate answer to your specific question using our AI assistant