What is the difference between full and partial template specialization?
Can you explain the difference between full and partial template specialization in C++? When would you use each one?
Full template specialization and partial template specialization are two ways to create specialized versions of a template, but they differ in how they specify the template arguments.
Full Specialization:
- Full specialization specifies values for all template parameters.
- It creates a completely new implementation for a specific set of template arguments.
- The template parameter list in the specialization is empty
<>
.
template <typename T>
class MyClass {/* ... */ };
// Full specialization for T = int
template <>
class MyClass<int> {/* ... */ };
Partial Specialization:
- Partial specialization specifies values for only a subset of template parameters.
- It creates a new implementation for a specific pattern of template arguments.
- The template parameter list in the specialization contains the remaining unspecified parameters.
template <typename T, typename U>
class MyClass {/* ... */ };
// Partial specialization for U = int
template <typename T>
class MyClass<T, int> {/* ... */ };
Use full specialization when you need to provide a completely different implementation for a specific type or set of types. Use partial specialization when you want to specialize a template based on a pattern of template arguments while still allowing some arguments to vary.
Partial specialization is particularly useful when you have multiple template parameters and want to specialize based on a subset of them. It allows you to create more targeted specializations without having to specify all the arguments.
Template Specialization
A practical guide to template specialization in C++ covering full and partial specialization, and the scenarios where they're useful