When to Use Move Semantics

In what situations should I use move semantics instead of copy semantics?

Move semantics should be used when you no longer need the original object and want to transfer ownership of its resources to another object. This is often the case when:

Example 1: You are returning a local object from a function:

Resource CreateResource() {
  Resource Temp;
  // ...
  return Temp;  
}

Here, Temp is a local object that will be destroyed when the function returns. By using move semantics, we can efficiently transfer its resources to the object being returned.

Example 2: You are assigning from a temporary object:

Resource A;
A = Resource();

The temporary Resource() will be destroyed after the assignment. Moving from it is more efficient than copying.

Example 3: You are passing an object to a function that will take ownership of it:

void TakeOwnership(Resource R) {
  // ...
}

Resource A;
TakeOwnership(std::move(A));

By moving A into the function, we efficiently transfer ownership of its resources to R.

In general, use move semantics when you want to optimize the transfer of resources and don't need the original object anymore.

Move Semantics

Learn how we can improve the performance of our types using move constructors, move assignment operators and std::move()

Questions & Answers

Answers are generated by AI models and may not have been reviewed. Be mindful when running any code on your device.

Why Not Always Use Move Semantics
If move semantics are more efficient, why not always use them instead of copy semantics?
The Rule of Five
What is the Rule of Five in C++, and how does it relate to move semantics?
Noexcept Move Operations
What is the purpose of marking move operations as noexcept?
Move Semantics and std::unique_ptr
How does std::unique_ptr utilize move semantics?
Move Semantics and Threads
How can move semantics be used to efficiently transfer resources between threads?
Or Ask your Own Question
Get an immediate answer to your specific question using our AI assistant